Grammar and the Teaching of Writing: Limits and Possibilities

Julia Hill

In Rei Noguchi’s “Grammar and the Teaching of Writing: Limits and Possibilities,” he explores the argument regarding the instruction of grammar in the classroom. He has a valid line of reasoning, that an over or under emphasis on traditional grammar can have a negative affect on the improvement of writing. I would agree with him; grammar has a place in the instruction of writing, but it should not be the main component.

Noguchi broke the connection between writing and grammar into three different components: grammar and content, grammar and organization, and grammar and style. The first two sections have no association with grammar. The latter, style, incorporates grammar; the way one uses grammar can determine one’s style. He explains, “because style involves both standard and nonstandard features, it covers such aspects of “mechanics” as verb tense, sentence fragments, run-ons, comma splices, and subject-verb agreement” (11). All of these are considered forms of grammar, which must be taught to students.

Although grammar is not the most important aspect of writing, it should not be disregarded all together. Yes, I would agree, the shock of receiving a paper back that you felt you had done extremely well on, with red markings all over, is quite disheartening. Teachers that focus more on the grammatical errors as opposed to the content and organization can damage students’ interest in writing in general. No student feels confident in their writing abilities with so many corrections made on a paper. Likewise, an under emphasis on grammar would be inappropriate. It would give students the authority to write in slang and ignore the rules. There is a “grammar” portion of every essay rubric for a reason. Even if the students chose to write improperly, they should still be taught the correct usage of grammar.

At the Plangere Writing Center, as tutors, we are instructed to read over students’ papers for the content and to get a feel for their organizational skills but not to be grammar critics unless there is a major reoccurring issue. This way, we can work with the students to improve the way they write papers, not silly little things like a misplaced comma. There is a time and place for grammar, but as tutors it should not be the main focus of each session. I will definitely take Noguchi’s advice on being a moderate stickler for grammar into consideration when it comes to tutoring.

Advertisements

About julhill

I am a graduate student at the Graduate School of Education. A am a recent alumni; graduating Summa Cum Laude from Rutgers University with a bachelor's of Spanish. I am currently spending three months in Mérida, Yucatán to better my Spanish, learn more about the culture and have fun! There's no time like the present. "Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn’t do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines, sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover.”
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Grammar and the Teaching of Writing: Limits and Possibilities

  1. 5/5
    Great response! I loved your last paragraph.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s